A Demonologist’s Reflections on Time Travel
(from +Seán
Manchester’s Stray Ghosts)
All text and pictures
© Seán Manchester

Returning for possibly the last time to
Swains Lane where a nether region had been experienced all those years prior
― even in the preceding two centuries, before the graveyard itself
existed, when “hobbs, ghaists and dæmons” were apparently sighted in the
same vicinity ― I cast a lingering glance through the bars of the north
gate.
Viewing
the eerie path from the north gate to the notorious heart of the graveyard.
Looking again at this once afflicted part of Highgate Cemetery, no longer harbouring a demonic contagion amongst its denizens, I faced the early evening sun as it shone from the direction of nearby St Michael’s Church. Then I continued to walk up Swains Lane and departed ― unlikely ever to return ― leaving the dead to take care of the dead. My work had long since been completed in connection with this place.
The journey had been long and oftentimes
difficult, and I wondered what the French vampirological and biblical scholar,
Dom Augustin Calmet, would have made of it all. He entered the Benedictine
Order in 1688, becoming ordained into the priesthood in 1696, after which he
was offered consecration to the episcopate by Pope Benedict XIII, but turned it
down. More than anything else, Calmet is remembered for his 1746 work on
vampires: Dissertations sur les Apparitions des Anges des Démons et des
Espits, et sur les revenants, et Vampires de Hongrie, de Boheme, et de Silésie.
My own experience in this field, which
commenced with the Highgate case, leaves me in absolutely no doubt,
but Calmet’s attempt to establish the veracity of such predatory demonic
entities lacked first-hand evidence. He seemed to concentrate on the collecting
of vampire reports, which he certainly did not dismiss out of hand, and then
offered his reflections on them. Calmet defined the phenomena as corpses that
returned from their graves to disturb the living by sucking their blood and
even causing death. The only remedy was to exhume the afflicted body, sever its
head, and drive a stake through the heart. Cremation was another effective
alternative. Using that definition, he gathered all the accounts he could find,
and it is these reports of collected data that take up the majority of space in
his volume. He justifiably condemned the hysteria which accompanied several of
the reported vampire incidents, and also considered all the natural
explanations that were offered for the phenomenon.
His findings were inconclusive. However,
Calmet did not state that the reports could be explained away by natural
causes, but he shrank from proposing an alternative answer. In other words, he
left the entire matter unresolved. Yet he seemed to favour the existence of
vampires by noting “that it seems impossible not to subscribe to the belief
which prevails in these countries that these apparitions do actually come forth
from the graves and that they are able to produce terrible effects which are so
widely and so positively attributed to them.” Calmet had posed five
possibilities for all the accounts he had considered. Three of these he
dismissed. The remaining two consisted of the possibility that vampires are the
result of the Devil’s interference, or just superstition. No firm conclusion
was apparent until the third and last edition, published in 1751, where in his
bestselling work he makes clear that he could conclude naught save that such
creatures as vampires really did return from the grave.
In the wake of my mysterious and
terrible discovery at Highgate Cemetery in August 1970 no such dilemma about
their existence would ever assail me again; though I did speculate on
explanations for the peculiar abilities attributed to this phenomena.
“They exist outside of normal time;
therefore, when discovered after centuries, a [corporeal host] might appear
three score years at most ― possibly much younger. … Time will do nothing
thereafter to efface its condition … Our earthly bodies move in time. The
vampire’s does not.” [The Highgate Vampire, page 39].
We are all stray ghosts to those who
glimpse us across the passage of time, which exploration Professor Ronald L
Mallett believes has already replaced space as the new challenge facing
scientists in the twenty-first century. All spirit creatures, of course, are
outside the limitations of time that are placed on us. This includes demons,
and, therefore, by default, vampires. Only by exorcism can the effected organic
matter be returned to its true condition ― and thus real time ―
when the demonic entity is expelled. The evil spirit is not destroyed; it is
merely removed from our time frame.
Sightings of living persons who are
mistaken for ghosts are probably few and far between because the circumstances which
make such an apparent haunting possible need to be precise. This does not rule
out the genuinely supernatural manifestation of either angelic or
demonic origin, as my late colleague Professor Devendra Prasad Varma would have been be quick to
point out. And I would have been no less quick to agree. Yet all along I have
wondered about time travel. That is not to say that much of what we sometimes
mistake as shades is to be viewed as time travellers from the past or future
passing through our present. More likely are we are experiencing a glimpse of
the same space in a different time frame. Albert Einstein showed us that time
and space are linked. Dr Mallett, who is a professor of theoretical physics at
the University of Connecticut, is in the process of constructing a time machine
that he claims will enable him to send sub-atomic particles into the past. To
do this he proposes to create a time warp where light is slowed down to a crawl
and contained in two opposing beams of light using a ring laser. Mallett
calculates that at high enough intensities, space and time could be twisted in
the circle within. His time machine might resemble a long light cylinder. “Once
it can be done, even in the simplest situation, in the most primitive way, the
engineering obstacles will be overcome,” says the professor, adding: “I
honestly believe this will be the century for time travel.” There is one
inescapable drawback. The machine being designed by Professor Ronald Mallett
will only be able to travel as far back as the moment it is switched on.
Mark 9: 23 tells us: “All things are
possible to him who believes.” However, the possibility of time travel poses
ethical and theological quandaries. Stephen Hawking has proposed a “chronology
protection conjecture” ― an as-yet-unknown law of physics that would
preserve causality and safeguard history from meddlers. I would not be able to
return to that fateful afternoon in August 1970, for example, and execute,
instead of the spoken exorcism rite inside the vault, a more effective, albeit
illicit, remedy to expel the demonic presence with the possible direct
consequence of Lusia, and other victims after 1970, still being
with us. Moreover, an astrophysicist would quickly point out that most of the
blueprints for a time machine stipulate that the traveller cannot journey back
to an era before the device was first switched on.
Yet it is claimed that a time machine
able to take the traveller into the past, far beyond when it was constructed, was
built in the 1950s. It was described as the Chronovisor.
Father Pellegrino Maria Ernetti
(1925-1994) was a Benedictine monk, scientist and foremost authority on archaic
music (2000 BC to AD 1200). Along with the help of scientists Enrico Fermi and Werner
von Braun, Ernetti is said to have developed the Chronovisor, a time
machine that could reach back into the past way beyond its own invented
existence to reconstruct the sights and sounds of history. A world-class
scholar of prepolyphonic music, he also held a degree in quantum and subatomic
physics. His principal research was in the field of time travel. Father Père
François Brune knew Ernetti well, and, based on his own experience, concludes
that Ernetti was too upright, knowledgeable, intelligent and accomplished to
have any need to fabricate a story, and wonders if the Chronovisor, or
information pertaining to it, may lie somewhere in the Vatican where it remains
hidden from the rest of the world.
My own immersion in music, the arcane
and indeed ecclesiasticism led to impressions of an understanding of a form of
time travel not so removed from those of Ernetti. Using his knowledge of the
physics of chordal structures, and based on a new principle he had uncovered,
involving musical frequencies, harmonic resonance and the relationship of these
things with the astral plane, Ernetti constructed a time machine from which he
claimed to have taken photographs of the past. Such images from across the
millennia were gained by an approach and perspective significantly removed from
Mallett’s dependance on s^2=x^2+y^2+z^2-ct^2 where s stands for space-time
(based on Einstein’s revolutionary concept of space-time, ie time is
distance and distance is time) and a Lorentz transformation invariant, ie
the distance has the same value for all inertial observers. That
notwithstanding, Einstein’s conclusion that space and time are aspects of the
same thing, and that matter and energy are also two aspects of the same thing
(E=mc^2), is invaluable to all potential builders of time machines.
Venice-based Father Ernetti, of course, incorporated rather more than
theoretical physics into his calculations when inventing his camera that
allegedly could focus into the past or future and take pictures of events from
that time.
My early career as a professional
photographer, life-long involvement in music, and later embrace of
ecclesiasticism made the Benedictine monk’s approach to time travel at once
comprehensible and something I naturally felt empathetic toward. Whether it was,
is, or ever could be a reality, is not something I feel qualified to
conjecture ― for I have already
experienced enough to know that all manner of things are possible. Yet it is
patently the final frontier to tempt those who might seek a future in the past.
Though courtesy, gentleness, honour and dignity might have all but departed from our world, there perhaps remains the possibility of catching a glimpse of these lost qualities somewhere in time.
The
author giving the homily during an Ecclesia Vetusta Catholica celebration of
the Holy Eucharist.
_____________________________________________________________________
The above text
and pictures from Stray Ghosts by Seán Manchester (unpublished
memoir) are copyright protected and cannot be reproduced without consent.